It has proved to be the most enduring image we have of our fragile world. Over a colourless lunar surface, the earth hangs like a gaudy Christmas bauble against a deep black background. The planet\u2019s blue disc — half in shadow — is streaked with faint traces of white, yellow and brown while its edge is sharply defined. There is no blurring that might be expected from the blanket of oxygen and nitrogen that envelops our planet. Our atmosphere is too thin to be seen clearly from the moon: a striking reminder — if we ever needed one — of the frailty of the biosphere that sustains life on Earth.<\/p>\n
This is \u201cEarthrise<\/a>\u201d, photographed by American astronaut Bill Anders<\/a> as he and his fellow Apollo 8<\/a><\/i> crewmen, Jim Lovell<\/a> and Frank Borman<\/a>, orbited the moon on December 24 — Christmas Eve \u2013 1968. His shot, taken 40 years ago this month, has become the most influential environmental image, and one of the most reproduced photographs, in history. Arguably, his picture is also the most important legacy of the Apollo space programme. Thanks to this image, humans could see, for the first time, their planet, not as continents or oceans, but as a world that was \u201cwhole and round and beautiful and small\u201d, as the poet Archibald MacLeish<\/a> put it.<\/p>\n Certainly, Earthrise is a striking reminder of Earth\u2019s vulnerability. We may have forgotten the men who risked their lives getting to the moon and who explored its dead landscape — a \u201cbeat-up\u201d world as they put it — but the view they brought back of that glittering blue hemisphere continues to mesmerise.<\/p>\n \u201cOur planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark,\u201d the American astronomer Carl Sagan<\/a> noted. \u201c\u2026 There is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.\u201d The opinion is shared by the British naturalist and broadcaster David Attenborough. \u201cI clearly remember my first sight [of the Earthrise photograph]. I suddenly realised how isolated and lonely we are on Earth.\u201d<\/p>\n Indeed, says the British space historian Robert Poole<\/a>, the first popular expressions of ecological concern can be traced to the publication of that picture: dazzling blue ocean, the jacket of cloud and the relative invisibility of the land and human settlement. \u201cIt is a rebuke to the vanity of humankind,\u201d says Poole. \u201cEarthrise was an epiphany in space.\u201d<\/p>\n In fact, Nasa<\/a> \u2013 the US space agency — had not intended to fly to the moon in 1968. Its lunar hardware was still unproven and Apollo 8<\/i> was slated merely to test equipment in low Earth orbit. However, that autumn, the agency was told, incorrectly, by the CIA<\/a> that the Soviet Union was preparing its own manned lunar mission. So the Apollo programme — established to fulfil president John F Kennedy\u2019s call<\/a> for a US manned lunar landing by the end of the decade — was accelerated and Apollo 8<\/i> designated for a journey to the moon, though there would be no landing craft to take men to the lunar surface. That would come on later missions.<\/p>\n The decision was controversial. Nasa\u2019s giant Saturn V<\/a> rocket, the only launcher capable of taking men to the moon, had been bedevilled by flaws and instrument failures on its two test flights. Worse, there had been the fire in 1967<\/a> in which three astronauts — Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee — were burned to death during a ground test of an Apollo capsule. Sending Lovell, Anders and Borman in an almost identical spacecraft to the moon, on an unsafe launcher, was a gamble, to say the least.<\/p>\n As a result, most press conferences in the run-up to the launch were dominated by questions about the risks the astronauts faced and, although the mission turned out to be a success, and surpassed all subsequent Apollo missions for the precision of its flight path and lack of glitches, it was dogged at the start by control-room nerves and tension.<\/p>\n Finally, at 6.31am on Saturday, December 21, the Saturn V — at 360 feet [about 110 metres] the tallest, most powerful rocket ever built and for the first time carrying a human crew — blasted Borman, Anders and Lovell into space. The launch was shattering. \u201cThe Earth shakes, cars rattle and vibrations beat in the chest,\u201d as Anne Morrow Lindbergh, the writer and wife of the aviator Charles Lindbergh, put it.<\/p>\n In the event, the rocket performed perfectly and put Apollo 8 safely into orbit. Using a \u201cstate-of-the-art\u201d computer — which had less power than a modern hand calculator — Lovell keyed in the commands that fired the launcher\u2019s third stage and sent their craft hurtling on its three-day journey to the moon. The spaceship had become the first manned vehicle to slip the surly bonds<\/a> of Earth and head to another world.<\/p>\n The outward trip was not without its mishaps. As the astronauts settled down for their first night in space, cramped into a craft the size of a mini-van, they found it difficult to sleep. So Borman tried a sleeping pill. This was a mistake. A couple of hours later, he was struck by a fit of vomiting and diarrhoea, a tricky affliction in zero gravity, as author Robert Zimmerman recalls in Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8<\/i>. [\u2026] Certainly, it was an inelegant way to travel to another world.<\/p>\n Early on Christmas Eve, Apollo 8<\/i> reached its destination. The astronauts fired the craft\u2019s Service Propulsion System (SPS<\/a>) rocket to slow as it swept past the moon and the little ship slipped into lunar orbit. For its first three revolutions, the astronauts kept its windows pointing down towards the moon and frantically filmed the craters and mountains below. Reconnaissance for subsequent Apollo landings was a key task for the mission.<\/p>\n It was not until Apollo 8<\/i> was on its fourth orbit that Borman decided to roll the craft away from the moon and to point its windows towards the horizon in order to get a navigational fix. (The capsule\u2019s astronauts still used sextants to guide their craft.) A few minutes later, he spotted a blue-and-white fuzzy blob edging over the horizon<\/a>.<\/p>\n Transcripts of the Apollo 8<\/i> mission reveal the astronaut in a rare moment of losing his cool as he realised what he was watching: Earth, then a quarter of million miles away, rising from behind the moon. \u201cOh my God! Look at the picture over there. Here\u2019s the earth coming up,\u201d Borman shouts.<\/p>\n This is followed by a flurry of startled responses from Anders and Lovell and a battle — won by Anders — to find a camera to photograph the unfolding scene. His first image is in black-and-white and shows Earth only just peeping over the horizon. A few minutes later, having stuffed a roll of 70mm colour film into his Hasselblad camera, he takes the \u201cEarthrise\u201d photograph that became an icon of 20th-century technological endeavour and ecological awareness.<\/p>\n In this way, humans first recorded their home planet from another world. \u201cIt was,\u201d Borman later recalled, \u201cthe most beautiful, heart-catching sight of my life, one that sent a torrent of nostalgia, of sheer homesickness, surging through me. It was the only thing in space that had any colour to it. Everything else was either black or white. But not the earth.\u201d Or as Lovell put it, our home world is simply \u201ca grand oasis\u201d.<\/p>\n I recently spoke to Lovell, now a vigorously healthy 80-year-old and owner of the Lovells of Lake Forest restaurant near Chicago, where his son, Jay, is chef. An experienced astronaut even before he flew on Apollo 8<\/i>, he achieved his greatest fame as commander of the ill-fated Apollo 13<\/i> mission — which only narrowly survived a fuel-tank explosion en route to the moon in 1970. (Lovell was played by Tom Hanks in Ron Howard\u2019s film, Apollo 13<\/i>, in 1995.) \u201cApollo 8<\/i> was a high point for me, without a doubt. Apollo 13<\/i> was certainly less pleasant. It was touch and go, after all.\u201d<\/p>\n He does not fail to appreciate the importance of that photograph. \u201cThe predominant colours were white, blue and brown,\u201d he recalled. \u201cThe green of the earth\u2019s grassland and forests is filtered out by the atmosphere and appears as a bluish haze from space.\u201d The effect is to give Earth an added, especially intense blue veneer.<\/p>\n \u201cBill [Anders] had the camera with colour film and a telephoto lens,\u201d he said. \u201cThat is what makes the picture. Earth is about the size of a thumbnail when seen with the naked eye from the moon. The telephoto lens makes it seem bigger and gives the picture that special quality.\u201d (Seven months later, Neil Armstrong — standing on the lunar surface — also noted he could blot out the earth with his thumb. Did that make him feel really big, he was asked years later? \u201cNo,\u201d the great astronaut replied, \u201cit made me feel really, really small.\u201d)<\/p>\n By Christmas Day, December 25, the whole world had become engrossed in Apollo 8<\/i>\u2019s epic journey: 1968 had been a particularly traumatic year and the planet was desperate for a diversion. In the United States, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King had been assassinated, the Vietnam War had worsened dramatically, and civil and student conflict was spreading through US cities. In Europe, the \u201cPrague spring\u201d had been crushed by Soviet tanks. People needed cheer and the realisation that humans had reached the moon provided that uplift perfectly.<\/p>\n There was a further twist to the mission\u2019s timing. Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C Clarke\u2019s visionary film epic 2001: A Space Odyssey<\/a><\/i> was then showing in cinemas round the globe. (The Apollo 8<\/i> crew had attended its Houston premiere three months earlier.) The film ends with the embryonic Star Child<\/a> hanging in space above the earth: a tiny, glittering blue disc very like the one that had just been pictured by Anders. The links between Apollo 8<\/i> and 2001<\/i> went further than that, however. The film depicts space travel as commonplace and, to prove the accuracy of its vision, there were men orbiting the moon. It seemed to many people — including myself, then a university student and a space-programme devotee — that all those dreams of science-fiction writers and film-makers might soon be realised. It was a wondrous Christmas.<\/p>\n Indeed, it can be fairly claimed that Apollo 8<\/i> was the real \u201cMan on the Moon\u201d story. By the time, Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin reached the moon on Apollo 11<\/i>, the world had already got used to the idea of manned lunar flight. By contrast, Apollo 8<\/i> took many people unawares. Certainly, you could easily argue that it, and not Apollo 11<\/i>, deserves the title of the greatest event of the 20th century. Lovell believes that. \u201cI sat beside Charles Lindbergh at the launch of Apollo 11<\/i>. \u2018It\u2019s a great event,\u2019 he said, \u2018but you know you were the ones who really spearheaded the moon programme\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n Anders, Borman and Lovell orbited the moon 10 times. Then, as they prepared to head back to Earth, the astronauts held a last televised press conference. They then took turns to read out the first 10 verses of the biblical book of Genesis<\/a> as they skimmed, at a height of 70 miles [112 kilometres] over the lunar surface. The Old Testament<\/a> struck many people as an odd choice for a final lunar reading. But all three (at the time, at least) were deeply religious: Borman and Lovell were Protestants, Anders a Catholic. None of them saw any ambiguity in reading out a version of creation that was at complete odds with the version supported by the scientists who had got them there. In any case, the reading went down well in America.<\/p>\n A few hours later, Lovell fired the SPS engine again and Apollo 8<\/i> began its homeward journey, splashing down in the Pacific Ocean on December 27. As the astronauts waited to be picked up by the US navy, 10-foot [three-metre] waves pounded their craft. Borman, once again, was sick. Apart from that, their homecoming was a triumph.<\/p>\n After that, Anders\u2019 colour film was processed and passed to the news media. Time<\/i> magazine ran the photograph with single word \u201cDawn\u201d, while Life<\/i> magazine published a lengthy display of images from the moon mission, including a poster-sized spread of the \u201cEarthrise\u201d photograph.<\/p>\n Seven months later, Apollo 11<\/i> reached the lunar surface. It was the beginning of the end for the space programme. Three years later, Apollo 17<\/i> lifted off from the moon, the last human visit to this dead world. The American public, who had funded the programme, tired of the moon and turned to concerns closer to home. \u201cLooking back, it is possible to see that Earthrise marked the tipping point, the moment when the sense of the space age flipped from what it means for space to what it meant for the Earth,\u201d Robert Poole writes in his recent book Earthrise: How Man First Saw the Earth.<\/i><\/p>\n Humans had spent billions in an attempt to explore another world and in the end rediscovered their own. It was a point stressed by Apollo 17<\/i> astronaut Harrison Schmitt, one of the last men on the moon. \u201cLike our childhood home, we really see the earth only as we prepare to leave it,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n However, of all the efforts to sum up the story of \u201cEarthrise\u201d, the best is made by the poet T S Eliot in the last of his Four Quartets<\/i><\/a>:<\/p>\n We shall not cease from exploration
\nAnd the end of all our exploring
\nWill be to arrive where we started
\nAnd know the place for the first time.<\/i><\/p>\n
\n(Additional research by Hermione Hoby)<\/b><\/div>\n