{"id":60094810,"date":"2025-08-19T16:17:07","date_gmt":"2025-08-19T15:17:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/?p=60094810"},"modified":"2025-08-28T13:29:53","modified_gmt":"2025-08-28T12:29:53","slug":"after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Talks at the UN headquarters in Geneva to reach an agreement to end plastic pollution came to a haphazard conclusion last week, with 184 countries unable to agree to a deal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nations rejected two versions of the draft treaty presented by the meeting\u2019s chair, Luis Vayas. Due to their lack of ambition, countries described them variously as \u201cunacceptable\u201d and \u201crepulsive\u201d, unusually strong wording for a diplomatic space.

The meeting, called INC5.2, was an extension of what was supposed to be the concluding meeting, INC5.1, in Busan last year<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While many are disappointed by the result, they also point to over 100 countries refusing to accept what they saw as a weak treaty. \u201cIt\u2019s better we take the time to get something good, and it\u2019s good that countries held that line in the face of pressure to get a deal,\u201d said Christina Dixon, a campaign lead at the Environmental Investigation Agency, a UK non-profit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Dixon added that there are \u201cserious limitations\u201d to continuing to negotiate under the status quo. Currently a small group of petrochemical-producing nations, now including the US, are blocking majority ambition. \u201cCountries will need to find a different dynamic and a different approach\u201d to reach any kind of future agreement, she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why did talks grind to a halt, and what is the path forward for the treaty process?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What happened in Geneva?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The momentum for the plastics treaty began at the UN Environment Assembly in 2022, when 175 countries signed a resolution<\/a> to draft a legally binding agreement to tackle plastic pollution across its full lifecycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since then, fault lines have formed between a majority of countries and a minority of oil-producing states. The majority want the treaty to include legally binding measures to reduce plastic production and to regulate plastic chemicals and problematic plastic products. The minority, including Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran, want it to focus solely on waste management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Busan last year, over 100 countries<\/a> backed ambitious provisions. But the draft remained riddled with brackets, signaling disagreement mainly with this minority group, and no time left to resolve it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Geneva gathering was a second attempt to find common ground, and seal a deal. The meeting also brought new allegiances into play. The world\u2019s largest plastics producer China appeared to start siding<\/a> more with ambitious countries. Meanwhile, under the Trump administration, the US started to visibly align<\/a> with Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran, contributing its influence as the world\u2019s second largest plastics producer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As negotiations grew increasingly fraught over the week, Sivendra Michael, Fiji\u2019s lead negotiator, acknowledged that \u201cwe have to compromise on some things.\u201d Michael was also lead negotiator on finance for the Pacific Small Island Developing States, among the most ambitious nations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s not even a treaty, it\u2019s an empty shell<\/blockquote>Camila Zepeda, Mexico\u2019s head of delegation<\/cite><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Getting limits on plastic production into the treaty has been a mainstay for ambitious countries throughout the treaty negotiations, with oil-producing minority states rejecting the idea. In the final two days, Fiji, as well as Norway and Mexico, all signalled to Dialogue Earth they may be willing to sacrifice a section on limits, if other sections to regulate chemicals and problematic plastics could be strengthened in turn. Bolstering these other areas, went the logic, could create different routes to manage plastic production rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But when the chair\u2019s draft<\/a> was released on 13 August, there was widespread shock. \u201cWe knew it wasn\u2019t going to be a perfect text. But I think people across the spectrum were surprised by its weakness,\u201d said Dennis Clare, a negotiator for Micronesia. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nothing was legally binding. The section on production limits had flipped to focus only on voluntary pollution controls. There were no measures to regulate chemicals. And sections on plastic-product design appeared to be voluntary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s not even a treaty, it\u2019s an empty shell,\u201d Camila Zepeda, Mexico\u2019s head of delegation, said afterwards. \u201cIf we were to adopt something of the sorts, it would basically just be on reporting on national measures that are voluntary. That\u2019s it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The draft also lacked obligations to contribute to financing needed to implement the treaty, making it \u201ca waste management framework without any clear funding,\u201d according to Clare. \u201cThat puts the whole burden of work on the countries downstream who are cleaning up waste that didn\u2019t even come from their region.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The draft was a step too far for most countries, over 100 of which plainly rejected it in the subsequent plenary meeting. The UK described it as the \u201clowest common denominator,\u201d the EU called it \u201cunacceptable\u201d and said \u201cit does not meet the minimum\u201d needed to tackle plastic pollution, while Panama labelled it \u201crepulsive,\u201d adding, \u201cThis is not ambition, it is surrender.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/div>
Juan Carlos Monterrey, a diplomat from Panama, speaks during a rally before the final plenary of the plastics treaty negotiations in Geneva (Image: Florian Fussstetter<\/a> \/ UNEP<\/a>, CC<\/a>)<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The crisis forced negotiators back into meetings to revise the draft, pushing the talks over the 14 August deadline. When a new draft<\/a> came out just before 1am on Friday 15, some elements had been returned to the text. But the language was still largely voluntary, it lacked restrictions on problematic plastic products and chemicals, and was weak on finance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, it failed to rejuvenate delegates and in the final plenary called just five hours later, countries largely refused the draft as the basis for ongoing negotiations. By this point, many civil society organisations, journalists and even delegates had already left.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The catch in consensus<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The weakness of the draft treaty shows the growing challenge of trying to reach consensus, the guiding star of most multilateral agreements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Geneva, many countries in the ambitious camp said they repeatedly compromised and crossed their red lines to try and reach this goal, but oil-producing nations barely budged. \u201cIt takes two to tango, and only one side, the majority, was making any concessions,\u201d said Neil Tangri, science and policy director, with the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Countries could break out of this bind, and move things forward in line with what the majority wants \u2013 by voting. While viewed as a last resort in consensus-driven multilateralism, rules allowing voting are commonplace, and usually require a two-thirds majority to push things forward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Voting hasn\u2019t been applied in the plastic treaty process despite several stalemates. This is because at INC2 in Paris, a minority of oil-producing countries rejected those rules. That echoes what happened at the start of the UN climate negotiation process in the 1990s where a group of oil states blocked<\/a> the voting norm before COP1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vote-blocking is seen as a stalling tactic from oil-producing states protecting their interests. While taking a vote risks alienating these countries, trying to do everything by consensus allows even a single country to veto the majority, resulting in weak or watered-down agreements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fact, some blame the lack of voting for dragging down ambition<\/a> throughout the UN climate negotiation process, and worry the plastics treaty process faces the same threat. Delegates at INC2 in Paris were not able to resolve their differences on voting, and parked the issue until a later date. But in the increasingly time-pressured negotiating environment, no one has since been willing to reopen the question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a world where state interests intertwine with fossil fuels, many now think voting is critical for environmental multilateralism to succeed. (The Centre for International Environmental Law, a non-profit, revealed<\/a> that 224 lobbyists registered for the Geneva talks, several on state delegations.) In fact, a major sticking point in Geneva was over a section to ensure voting could be used at future plastic treaty COPs, which had support of over 120 countries but was rejected by a minority, said Dixon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
Recommended<\/span><\/span><\/div><\/a>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo for example, even though 103 countries supported a production-reduction proposal, they might be willing to drop the global target if they knew they could adopt a global target later. But without having the possibility to vote agreed, they\u2019ve got no assurances. We find ourselves in the climate space, where we would just be hamstrung by [the need for unanimous] consensus.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another option beyond voting is for ambitious countries to break free from blockers, and forge a treaty outside of the UN system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This involves some risks, including that it might not draw in enough countries, or may not attract major plastics producers and exporters like China, which could weaken its utility. But other international agreements have thrived by exiting the UN, such as the Mine Ban Treaty, which has grown to include over 160 countries and has significantly reduced the production and use of landmines worldwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If negotiations don\u2019t progress, it\u2019s not the end of the road. Countries can try other routes to reach their goal. \u201cIt is not unprecedented, it is possible,\u201d said Alexandra Harrington, chair of the IUCN World Commission on Environmental Law Agreement on Plastic Pollution Task Force. \u201cI do think if we continue to see this type of deadlock, and such an inability to move forward in the negotiations, there could indeed be much more interest in going outside.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Urgency on the ground<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Amid the uncertainty, dozens of civil society organisations in Geneva highlighted the damage a weak treaty would do to the most vulnerable. When the chair\u2019s first draft was published, dozens gathered in near 40C heat to urge delegates to stand for ambition, as they filed into the plenary hall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prem Singh Tharu, member of the International Indigenous Peoples\u2019 Forum on Plastics, told Dialogue Earth the initial text \u201cwas completely disrespectful to Indigenous Peoples,\u201d who were mentioned only once in the first draft, down from 11 times in a previous version. Indigenous lands and livelihoods are often disproportionately affected<\/a> by plastic production and waste.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many advocates from Indigenous and black frontline communities had travelled from the US, where hotbeds of petrochemical production in places like Port Arthur, Texas, produce high levels of cancer-causing chemicals including benzene. \u201cJust down the road from my community, they\u2019re building an eight to ten billion dollar petrochemical plant to produce more plastics,\u201d said John Beard, founder of the Port Arthur Community Action Network. His community\u2019s health is being sacrificed to make excessive quantities of plastic for which there is \u201cnot enough use,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
Recommended<\/span><\/span><\/div><\/a>\n\n\n\n

The Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) highlighted the health impacts of \u201cfalse solutions<\/a>\u201d like plastic burning for waste-to-energy projects, which will worsen without regulation.  John Chweya, head of a Kenyan wastepickers association, said he could not accept a treaty that lacked language on a just transition for workers who are in the \u201cdeepest pits of plastic pollution\u201d. He also highlighted the mounting costs of travelling to each new INC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite Pacific Island states contributing just 1.3%<\/a> of mismanaged plastics globally, Fiji\u2019s Michael noted that they bear the burden of rising production via ocean pollution. \u201cIt\u2019s so easy for many to forget what is really at stake for our people. We are already at the front line of climate change. Our communities are having to relocate\u2026 and now we have to deal with this plastic crisis.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the urgency for vulnerable groups, a weak treaty is worse than a delayed treaty, said Salisa Traipipitsiriwat, senior campaigner and Southeast Asia plastics project manager at EJF. She urged people to avoid the trap of blaming ambitious countries for the lack of an agreement so far. \u201cWhat we need to criticise is the procedure that doesn\u2019t allow these ambitious countries to win,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The road ahead<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The final rushed hours of the meeting left a great deal undecided and unclear. What is known is that the negotiations will revert back to the text developed in Busan, possibly including elements from Geneva, and that there will be another INC, says Harrington \u2013 an INC5.3. The date has not yet been set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, there may be some soul-searching about the road ahead. Clare questions the perception that the talks “failed” because they have not yet delivered an agreement. International treaties take time, and the plastics process has been comparatively fast. But getting a deal quickly is in any case not where the emphasis should be, he believes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPacific Small Island Developing States and Micronesia, we\u2019ve been clear about that from the start. The pressure should not be from the timing, or the perception that the talks may fail. The pressure should be from considering the needs of those who are going to be harmed by plastic.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3707,"featured_media":60094832,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[50039901,760],"tags":[514,555,569,578],"hashtags":[],"country":[50003615],"class_list":["post-60094810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ocean","category-pollution","tag-chemicals","tag-indigenous-peoples","tag-negotiations","tag-plastics","country-world-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAfter Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal? | Dialogue Earth<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Dialogue Earth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-19T15:17:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-28T12:29:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Emma Bryce\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Emma Bryce\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b23f477013a0c85e4969409f9fa4ec5\"},\"headline\":\"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-19T15:17:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-28T12:29:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\"},\"wordCount\":2079,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"Chemicals\",\"Indigenous peoples\",\"Negotiations\",\"Plastics\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Ocean\",\"Pollution\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\",\"name\":\"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal? | Dialogue Earth\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-19T15:17:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-28T12:29:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":800,\"caption\":\"3C9K7M3 Environmental artist Benjamin von Wong and his installation The Thinker's Burden outside the United Nations Geneva Headquarters. The installation was made in collaboration with the Minderoo Foundation, SLS Illusions and with the help of a dozen volunteers. During the week of negotiations around the Global Plastic Treaty, the sculpture will slowly be engulfed in plastic waste. Credit: Orjan Ellingvag\/Alamy Live News\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Dialogue Earth\",\"description\":\"Global climate and environment news\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"\u5bf9\u8bdd\u5730\u7403\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dialogue-Earth-Symbol-Logo_Black-Text.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dialogue-Earth-Symbol-Logo_Black-Text.png\",\"width\":256,\"height\":256,\"caption\":\"\u5bf9\u8bdd\u5730\u7403\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DialogueEarth_\",\"\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/DialogueEarth.English\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/dialogue.earth\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/dialogueearth\/\"],\"publishingPrinciples\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/about\/\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b23f477013a0c85e4969409f9fa4ec5\",\"name\":\"Emma Bryce\",\"description\":\"Emma Bryce is a freelance journalist who covers stories focused on the environment, conservation and climate change. You can tweet her at @EmmaSAanne and read more at www.emmabryce.com.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/author\/emma-bryce\/\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/author\/emma-bryce\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal? | Dialogue Earth","description":"UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?","og_description":"UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019","og_url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/","og_site_name":"Dialogue Earth","article_published_time":"2025-08-19T15:17:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-28T12:29:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Emma Bryce","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/"},"author":{"name":"Emma Bryce","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b23f477013a0c85e4969409f9fa4ec5"},"headline":"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?","datePublished":"2025-08-19T15:17:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-28T12:29:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/"},"wordCount":2079,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg","keywords":["Chemicals","Indigenous peoples","Negotiations","Plastics"],"articleSection":["Ocean","Pollution"],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/","url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/","name":"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal? | Dialogue Earth","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-08-19T15:17:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-28T12:29:53+00:00","description":"UN negotiations collapsed last week after countries branded the proposed treaty \u2018unacceptable\u2019 and \u2018repulsive\u2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/22The-Thinkers-Burden22-outside-the-United-Nations-Geneva-Headquarters_Orjan-Ellingvag_Alamy_3C9K7M3-1200px-copy.jpeg","width":1200,"height":800,"caption":"3C9K7M3 Environmental artist Benjamin von Wong and his installation The Thinker's Burden outside the United Nations Geneva Headquarters. The installation was made in collaboration with the Minderoo Foundation, SLS Illusions and with the help of a dozen volunteers. During the week of negotiations around the Global Plastic Treaty, the sculpture will slowly be engulfed in plastic waste. Credit: Orjan Ellingvag\/Alamy Live News"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/ocean\/after-geneva-how-can-the-world-salvage-a-plastics-deal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"After Geneva, how can the world salvage a plastics deal?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/","name":"Dialogue Earth","description":"Global climate and environment news","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#organization","name":"\u5bf9\u8bdd\u5730\u7403","url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dialogue-Earth-Symbol-Logo_Black-Text.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dialogue-Earth-Symbol-Logo_Black-Text.png","width":256,"height":256,"caption":"\u5bf9\u8bdd\u5730\u7403"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/DialogueEarth_","","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/DialogueEarth.English","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/dialogue.earth\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/dialogueearth\/"],"publishingPrinciples":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/about\/"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b23f477013a0c85e4969409f9fa4ec5","name":"Emma Bryce","description":"Emma Bryce is a freelance journalist who covers stories focused on the environment, conservation and climate change. You can tweet her at @EmmaSAanne and read more at www.emmabryce.com.","url":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/author\/emma-bryce\/","sameAs":["https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/author\/emma-bryce\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60094810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3707"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60094810"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60094810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60096047,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60094810\/revisions\/60096047"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60094832"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60094810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60094810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60094810"},{"taxonomy":"hashtags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hashtags?post=60094810"},{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialogue.earth\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=60094810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}