Food

Debate on desert-conversion technology heats up

A novel approach to transforming desert into farmland has been the subject of heated debate between scientists over the past week.

In January, Yi Zhijian, a professor of mechanics from Chongqing Jiaotong University published an article claiming his team has managed to turn patches of desert into soil at multiple sites across northern China, by applying a plant-based cellulosic material and spraying it with water to bind sand grains. 

Yi calls this process “desert soilisation”. He also claims that sowing and planting can start immediately after the process, and that the yields of sorghum and radish were high on several of his demonstration plots in the Ulan Buh desert, Inner Mongolia. This technology, Yi suggests, will help deserts contribute to food security and carbon sequestration.

In early April, the same journal published a rebuttal by Wu Bo, a desert ecologist from the Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, and Zheng Yongchun, from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. They argue that cellulose has long been used in agriculture and desertification control to retain water. Although it can make sand grains more cohesive, they say this does not change the characteristics of sand, nor bring nutrients to plants. The sodium-based material used by Yi’s experiments could also result in alkali pollution.

Worse still, Wu and Zheng say, growing crops in deserts massively increases the evaporation of local surface and groundwater, and such practices will ultimately rely on irrigation. They argue that the limited evidence of crop success in Yi’s plots benefitted from the shallow groundwater table in the area, and point out that the project itself is equipped with irrigation ponds.

There was an additional exchange between the two sides this week. The rebutters argue that all evidence from Yi’s team are photos rather than basic data on groundwater impact, nor is there consideration for the cost of the cellulosic material they use, which has implications for the economic viability of such an approach. They point out that the ultimate constraint of vegetation in deserts is not soil, but water, and stress natural deserts are important ecosystems not to be eliminated.

When Yi’s approach was first reported in 2017, it caused controversy immediately. However, in the same year he was recognised by the publicity department of the CCP as one of 10 model scientific researchers. Yi told a journalist at the time that the average cost of his approach in Ulan Buh is 2,000 yuan per mu (about US$300 per 1/15 of a hectare), and that many interested companies withheld their investment after learning about the high cost.

Read our report from 2017 on yaks being employed to fight desertification in the Zoigê grasslands of northwestern China.

-->
Cookies Settings

Dialogue Earth uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser. It allows us to recognise you when you return to Dialogue Earth and helps us to understand which sections of the website you find useful.

Required Cookies

Required Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Dialogue Earth - Dialogue Earth is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting a common understanding of the world's urgent environmental challenges. Read our privacy policy.

Cloudflare - Cloudflare is a service used for the purposes of increasing the security and performance of web sites and services. Read Cloudflare's privacy policy and terms of service.

Functional Cookies

Dialogue Earth uses several functional cookies to collect anonymous information such as the number of site visitors and the most popular pages. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website.

Google Analytics - The Google Analytics cookies are used to gather anonymous information about how you use our websites. We use this information to improve our sites and report on the reach of our content. Read Google's privacy policy and terms of service.

Advertising Cookies

This website uses the following additional cookies:

Google Inc. - Google operates Google Ads, Display & Video 360, and Google Ad Manager. These services allow advertisers to plan, execute and analyze marketing programs with greater ease and efficiency, while enabling publishers to maximize their returns from online advertising. Note that you may see cookies placed by Google for advertising, including the opt out cookie, under the Google.com or DoubleClick.net domains.

Twitter - Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find compelling and follow the conversations.

Facebook Inc. - Facebook is an online social networking service. China Dialogue aims to help guide our readers to content that they are interested in, so they can continue to read more of what they enjoy. If you are a social media user, then we are able to do this through a pixel provided by Facebook, which allows Facebook to place cookies on your web browser. For example, when a Facebook user returns to Facebook from our site, Facebook can identify them as part of a group of China Dialogue readers, and deliver them marketing messages from us, i.e. more of our content on biodiversity. Data that can be obtained through this is limited to the URL of the pages that have been visited and the limited information a browser might pass on, such as its IP address. In addition to the cookie controls that we mentioned above, if you are a Facebook user you can opt out by following this link.

Linkedin - LinkedIn is a business- and employment-oriented social networking service that operates via websites and mobile apps.