Business

Breaking ships, risking lives

New EU safety proposals for vessel-recycling could save hundreds of south Asian workers from injury and poisoning, writes John Vidal. But some developing countries say stricter rules could wreck local economies.
English

When the rusty, old supertanker Lara 1 reached Bangladesh in late April, the captain stoked up its engines for the last time and rammed it as far up the beach at Chittagong as possible. The 70-metre-tall, 400-metre-long iron colossus now squats in the mud in the Rising Steel ship-breaking yard, waiting to be picked over by an army of young men risking their lives for little more than US$1.60 a day.

The Lara 1 is one of the largest corpses in the world’s biggest graveyard of ships. A half-dismembered bulk carrier lies on one side, the remains of a European car ferry on the other.

Beyond it – stretched along about 20 kilometres of what just a decade ago was a pristine sandy beach – ore carriers, container ships, gas tankers, cruise liners and cargo ships of every size and description are being dismantled by hand in 140 similar yards. Every year more than 250 redundant ships, many from Europe, come here to be broken up.

It will take gangs of oxyacetylene cutters nearly six months to dismember the 42,000-tonne Lara 1. In the first week, say its owners, oils, toxic sludges and other waste will be pumped out, parts of the bow and some bulkheads will be removed and the recycling will start. The cable, the steel, the generators, funnels, propellers, lifeboats, companionways, sinks, toilets, even the light bulbs and every nut and bolt of the Lara 1 will be sold on the Bangladeshi market, to be turned into construction materials, girders, metal sheets and furniture. The sheet metal will be used for riverboats and coastal craft.

“Every bit of this ship will be recycled, reused and resold,” says Hefazatur Rahman, chairman of the Mostafa Group of Industries, which paid US$20 million to buy the Lara 1 for scrap. “Nothing will go to waste. This ship will help build Bangladesh. We dismantle 2.5 million tonnes of steel a year from Chittagong, but we need four million tonnes to keep growing.” If world steel prices rise in the next year, says Rahman, the Mostafa Group could make a US$10 million profit – or lose everything if prices fall, as they did in 2008.

But now, in a move that India, Bangladesh and other developing countries with major ship-breaking industries say could wreck local economies, the European Union has proposed laws stating that ships registered in Europe should be broken up only in licensed yards meeting strict new environmental guidelines. It estimates that up to 1.3 million tonnes of toxic materials on board end-of-life vessels are sent each year to Chittagong and other ship-breaking yards in south Asia from the EU alone, with “incalculable” risks to workers.

Under the system, outlined recently in Brussels, European ships will have to remove toxic wastes before they are exported, and ship-recycling yards will have to meet strict environmental and safety requirements. European ships will be recycled only in the best yards.

Few yards in Bangladesh or India, the world’s two largest centres of ship-breaking, can expect to meet the proposed standards without massive investment. Figures are hard to verify but, say local Chittagong watchdogs, in the past 10 years hundreds of men working in the 70 breaking yards have died or been maimed or poisoned. Many are from the poorest communities in the country.

“On average, one worker dies in the yards a week and every day a worker is injured. It seems like nobody really cares,” says Muhammed Shahin, an officer with Young Power in Social Action (YPSA). “Workers are easily replaceable to the yard owners: if one is lost, they know another 10 are waiting to replace him. The government collects the taxes and turns a blind eye.”

“Explosions of leftover gas and fumes in the tanks are the prime cause of accidents in the yards,” Shahin says. Other accidents are caused by falls – because the men are not given safety harnesses – or by workers being crushed by falling beams or plates, or electrocuted.

Recently, the Exxon Valdez, the ship responsible in 1989 for one of the largest oil spills in US history, was sold for scrap and is expected to be broken up on a beach somewhere in south Asia. [The vessel, now known as the Oriental Nicety, was denied entry into the west Indian port of Alang in early May. Bloomberg News reported that the move came after a New Delhi-based activist with Toxics Watch Alliance argued in a petition to the Indian supreme court that the ship contained asbestos and heavy metals.]

“It is outrageous that this ship, which has already created one environmental catastrophe, is being allowed to kill and pollute yet again,” said Jim Puckett, executive director of the Basel Action Network, which works to prevent the globalisation of the toxic chemical crisis. “The ship’s owner must be held accountable for simply selling this toxic time bomb and then walking away.”

According to the YPSA, most workers wear no protective gear and many work barefoot. “There is hardly any testing system for the use of cranes, lifting machinery or a motorised pulley,” says Shahin. “The yards re-use ropes and chains recovered from the broken ships without testing their strength. Fires, gas explosions, falling steel plates, exposure to poisons from bunker oil, lubricants, paints and cargo slop have left thousands with respiratory diseases.”

But the breakers insist that safety conditions have improved. “We have changed. It is much safer now. It’s quite different,” says Nazmul Islam, secretary of the Bangladesh Ship Breakers Association (BSBA). “We are installing modern equipment and are guided by international law. We have built a 150-bed hospital for workers. The supreme court in Bangladesh has given us new directives, and we have incinerators and separators. Compared with just three years ago, it’s much better. We now have storage facilities for asbestos.”

But the EU environment commissioner, Janez Potočnik, is not convinced. “Although the ship recycling sector has improved its practices,” he says, “many facilities continue to operate under conditions that are dangerous and damaging. This proposal aims to ensure that our old ships are recycled in a way that respects the health of workers as well as the environment. It is a clear signal to invest urgently in upgrading recycling facilities.”

What is certain is that ship-breaking has become essential to Bangladesh’s breakneck industrial growth. Apart from providing nearly half the steel the country of 160 million people uses a year, the government collects nearly US$15 million in revenue from an industry that employs more than 20,000 people directly and as many indirectly.

https://www.guardian.co.uk/

Copyright © Guardian News and Media Limited 2012  

Homepage image by Stéphane M Grueso shows a cutter at a ship-breaking yard in Chittagong, Bangladesh

Cookies Settings

Dialogue Earth uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser. It allows us to recognise you when you return to Dialogue Earth and helps us to understand which sections of the website you find useful.

Required Cookies

Required Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Dialogue Earth - Dialogue Earth is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting a common understanding of the world's urgent environmental challenges. Read our privacy policy.

Cloudflare - Cloudflare is a service used for the purposes of increasing the security and performance of web sites and services. Read Cloudflare's privacy policy and terms of service.

Functional Cookies

Dialogue Earth uses several functional cookies to collect anonymous information such as the number of site visitors and the most popular pages. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website.

Google Analytics - The Google Analytics cookies are used to gather anonymous information about how you use our websites. We use this information to improve our sites and report on the reach of our content. Read Google's privacy policy and terms of service.

Advertising Cookies

This website uses the following additional cookies:

Google Inc. - Google operates Google Ads, Display & Video 360, and Google Ad Manager. These services allow advertisers to plan, execute and analyze marketing programs with greater ease and efficiency, while enabling publishers to maximize their returns from online advertising. Note that you may see cookies placed by Google for advertising, including the opt out cookie, under the Google.com or DoubleClick.net domains.

Twitter - Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find compelling and follow the conversations.

Facebook Inc. - Facebook is an online social networking service. China Dialogue aims to help guide our readers to content that they are interested in, so they can continue to read more of what they enjoy. If you are a social media user, then we are able to do this through a pixel provided by Facebook, which allows Facebook to place cookies on your web browser. For example, when a Facebook user returns to Facebook from our site, Facebook can identify them as part of a group of China Dialogue readers, and deliver them marketing messages from us, i.e. more of our content on biodiversity. Data that can be obtained through this is limited to the URL of the pages that have been visited and the limited information a browser might pass on, such as its IP address. In addition to the cookie controls that we mentioned above, if you are a Facebook user you can opt out by following this link.

Linkedin - LinkedIn is a business- and employment-oriented social networking service that operates via websites and mobile apps.