Climate

The last day: endless bad news

English

Early this morning, my friend from the UNFCCC said that the Convention’s long-term cooperation special task group meeting lasted till 5 a.m. without any progress. This confirmed what was said by the previous negotiator. Last night, this negotiator told me that the day-long negotiations on the 18th would not make much progress,

Whereas at another track, due to lack of support right from the beginning, the special task group meeting of the Kyoto Protocol on the 15th was held for only half an hour when it went into closed negotiation. Afterwards, there was not even any sign of rumours to speak of.

Las night, 28 countries worked through the night and managed an agreement. This might well be what is called a ‘transitional’ result. What has not yet been agreed will have to wait.

In the afternoon’s heads of states speeches, all the interested parties were still blaming each other in a tit-for-tat fashion.

After a thousand entreaties, Obama appeared, and spoke with the hope of the whole world on his shoulders. The result was downright disappointing. Throughout his whole speech, Obama was ashen faced, and in a so-and-so-and-whatever manner, it was like he had a quarrel with someone before he appeared.

He said that he came to Copenhagen to act, not to make pointless talks. But according to a Chinese reporter, many felt that the content of his whole speech was emptier than the rice bowls of the African refugees.

Obama’s ‘main economic’ concept was clearly to allocate the ‘four main developing countries’ over to the camp of the developed countries.

He also said that as long as there is reduction in emission, as long as there is transparency, there will be aid. This is very different to Prime Minister Wen Jiabao’s speech, which was made before Obama’s. As a result, it was said in the press lobby that the Chinese cannot tolerate this, and a response is needed.

The interesting thing is that before the heads of states speeches, it was widely rumoured amongst the Chinese delegation that Prime Minister Wen was to hold an internal press conference with the Chinese reporters. A friend firmly believed this. He said he saw those from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs moving tables, as if in full combat readiness. I bet with him that Wen would not come.

My analysis is that to do this is very risky. To go to the Chinese News and Exchange Centre from anywhere in Bella Centre, one has to pass through public spaces. At this critical juncture, the several thousand reporters from around the world were staring at the Chinese leader like rats having been starved for two weeks. It was impossible for them not to crowd towards him. If this happens in a small press room, Prime Minister Wen will not even have an escape route. Moreover, there are only several simple boards along the sides in that press room with no ceiling. If something happened, it would be an extremely embarrassing situation.

I won in the end. Of course, without Prime Minister Wen’s press conference, it was bad news for the conference and for the reporters.

But Prime Minister Wen delayed going back to China, and instead was having a closed meeting with Obama. It seems that the negotiation is not in an ordinary kind of trouble.

Following to the customs of COP, this time it is again very likely that negotiations will last till morning of the 19th. Anyhow, the leaders have come, and probably they will also sign something. But they still need to hold out in some outstanding issues on specific details. No one will dare to give way until the last moment. Otherwise, they run the danger of ‘selling’ their own countries.

How sad when one thinks about this. Clearly this is a disaster for all to work together, but instead they behaved as if gambling for interests. Humankind’s selfish instinct has won over morality and rationality. It seems that this has not changed since antiquity. It was like this with the Israeli Palestinian conflict. It was like this with the two world wars in the last century, and it was the same with the messy wars in Europe in the last one thousand years.

Obama and Wen Jiabao are not saviours of the world, but who then can save Copenhagen?

Just now, rumours from the Climate Group experts said that today’s talks will not get any closer. It is likely that they will be delayed again and again.

Those who endured and got blood-shot eyes are still waiting for good news in the wake of hopelessness, even though no one really believes in miracles.

-->
Cookies Settings

Dialogue Earth uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser. It allows us to recognise you when you return to Dialogue Earth and helps us to understand which sections of the website you find useful.

Required Cookies

Required Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Dialogue Earth - Dialogue Earth is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting a common understanding of the world's urgent environmental challenges. Read our privacy policy.

Cloudflare - Cloudflare is a service used for the purposes of increasing the security and performance of web sites and services. Read Cloudflare's privacy policy and terms of service.

Functional Cookies

Dialogue Earth uses several functional cookies to collect anonymous information such as the number of site visitors and the most popular pages. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website.

Google Analytics - The Google Analytics cookies are used to gather anonymous information about how you use our websites. We use this information to improve our sites and report on the reach of our content. Read Google's privacy policy and terms of service.

Advertising Cookies

This website uses the following additional cookies:

Google Inc. - Google operates Google Ads, Display & Video 360, and Google Ad Manager. These services allow advertisers to plan, execute and analyze marketing programs with greater ease and efficiency, while enabling publishers to maximize their returns from online advertising. Note that you may see cookies placed by Google for advertising, including the opt out cookie, under the Google.com or DoubleClick.net domains.

Twitter - Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find compelling and follow the conversations.

Facebook Inc. - Facebook is an online social networking service. China Dialogue aims to help guide our readers to content that they are interested in, so they can continue to read more of what they enjoy. If you are a social media user, then we are able to do this through a pixel provided by Facebook, which allows Facebook to place cookies on your web browser. For example, when a Facebook user returns to Facebook from our site, Facebook can identify them as part of a group of China Dialogue readers, and deliver them marketing messages from us, i.e. more of our content on biodiversity. Data that can be obtained through this is limited to the URL of the pages that have been visited and the limited information a browser might pass on, such as its IP address. In addition to the cookie controls that we mentioned above, if you are a Facebook user you can opt out by following this link.

Linkedin - LinkedIn is a business- and employment-oriented social networking service that operates via websites and mobile apps.