Water

In Pakistan, bottled water may be unfit to drink

Lack of clean drinking water forces Pakistanis to buy bottled water if they can afford it, but repeated tests show that is no guarantee of safety
<p>Water leaves a bottling plant near Karachi</p>

Water leaves a bottling plant near Karachi

Nearly 35% percent of Pakistan’s estimated 182 million people do not have access to safe drinking water. According to Pakistan’s National Drinking Water Policy of 2009, the burden of disease related to water, sanitation and hygiene costs the country about Rs 112 billion ($1.1 billion) each year.

The poor quality of drinking water has forced those who can afford it to buy bottled water. According to a World Bank report of 2011, bottled water consumption comprised 29% of water-related costs, equivalent to 1.4% of total economic costs and 0.05%. The cost of bottled water consumption was Rs 4.67 billion ($76.72 million).

Despite this, Ghulam Murtiza is not deceived by the clear and sterile appearance of the bottled water available around Karachi. He should know; he has been in the business of monitoring water quality – both of groundwater and bottled water – for over a decade.

The latest report on bottled water quality by the government-run Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR)  is a clear indictment of the grim situation of water quality that Murtiza is well acquainted with, working there as a research officer.

Among the various tasks that include rural water and ground water investigations and monitoring through a chain of 19 laboratories in all four provinces of the country, since 2005 the PCRWR has been testing bottled water too.

“Every quarter we submit a report on the bottled water brands we have tested to the Ministry of Science and Technology,” Murtiza told thethirdpole.net.

In the current report a set of four bottles each of 71 commercially available brands were collected and sealed on site with identification codes allotted. These samples were collected from seven big cities (Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Tando Jam, Lahore, Quetta, Sialkot and Karachi) from three of the four provinces of Pakistan.

Samples of bottled water after being sealed for tests
Samples of bottled water after being sealed for tests

Eight brands completely unsafe

Of these, eight brands were found to be “completely unsafe” for human consumption as they had levels of arsenic, sodium and potassium far higher than the permissible limits prescribed by the national standardization body – according to a report by the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA).

Working under the Ministry of Science and Technology, PSQCA licenses bottling plants to sell their products after it has ascertained the quality meets the standards it has set.

In the three bottled water brands deemed unsafe, arsenic levels ranged from 11 to 35 parts per billion (ppb) compared to the permissible limit of 10 ppb set by the PSQCA.

Secretary General of the Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) Mirza Ali Azhar told thethirdpole.net that if arsenic exceeds the permissible limit, it can slowly damage the nervous system, liver and kidneys. It can also affect the reproductive organs.

Health practitioners say increased exposure to potassium can adversely affect kidneys, heart, hypertension and diabetes.

Bacteriological contaminants (coliforms) were detected in three more brands. Ali Azhar said microbiological contamination causes cholera, diarrhoea, dysentery, hepatitis, typhoid and other diseases.

While the 2009 drinking water policy recognises “access to safe drinking water” as a “fundamental right of every citizen”, emphasizes on the enforcement of the National Drinking Water Quality Standards, and the government approved the National Standards for Drinking Water Quality (NSDWQ) in 2010, the reality is otherwise. In Pakistan over 53,300 children die every year from diarrhoea caused by unsafe water and poor sanitation, according to a 2009 report by UNICEF.

“We submit the report and our job ends there. Then it is up to the licensing authority, which is, the PSQCA, to take action,” explained Murtiza.

“That’s true,” said Waiz Ikramul Haq of the PQSCA, in Karachi. “We only monitor brands that we have given licence to but there are as many unauthorised set-ups in private homes that we cannot do anything about, other than seal them. But these come up again in no time with a different brand.”

“Unless the water is checked for the mineral content and microbiology, it is illegal to bottle that water and use it for commercial purposes,” Haq informed.

Furthermore, said PCRWR’s Murtiza, it is illegal to sell water coming from the government’ supply line.

In the provinces of Sindh and Balochistan of which he is in charge, there were 106 bottling units (plants) which sell 125 brands of bottled water, Haq said. “We recently sealed over a dozen factories doing illegal business.”

“Often, when a licence is cancelled, in just a few days, they re-emerge with a brand new identity,” said Murtiza.

Water is one of the 78 items that PQSCA monitors through its ten field officers. There is an evident staff shortage.

On top of that, there is the slow pace of the judicial system. Haq finds their exercises “futile”. “The penalty is there, but what’s the point when the judicial action may take months, even years and appearances before the magistrates carries on endlessly?” he asked.

The PSQCA takes the errant bottlers to court, and violating its rules can result in a fine of at least Rs 50,000 and one year behind bars. But the slow pace of the judicial system frustrates the officials.

However, there is a brighter way of looking at the situation. English daily Dawn said making PCRWR’s findings public may be having a “deterrent effect”, because the new figure is lower than what was found in the first quarter of last year – 21 unsafe brands.

The testing process
The testing process

Clean water at home?

Many people have installed reverse osmosis plants in their homes to clean the water before drinking, but have no means to test the final product.

Despite this, Murtiza emphasized that bottled water is no replacement to the water people get piped to their homes. “We also test water quality from the water supply system and over the years the quality has rapidly deteriorated.”

Water quality profiles of 24 major cities and 23 surface water bodies (rivers, reservoirs/ dams, canals etc.) on the PCRWR website showed that of the 64 sub-districts (called Tehsils), 48 had water unfit for drinking. Nearly 80-85 % of water samples tested were bacteriologically unsafe – turbid and containing dissolved solids above permissible limits.

Similar checks in 23 major cities revealed that the four major contaminants in drinking water sources of Pakistan were bacteriological (68%), arsenic (24%), nitrate (13%) and fluoride (5%).

Bottled water is consumed by a very small percentage of people in urban areas who can afford to do so; the rest of the population uses groundwater. Pakistan clearly has a problem on both counts.

Cookies Settings

Dialogue Earth uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser. It allows us to recognise you when you return to Dialogue Earth and helps us to understand which sections of the website you find useful.

Required Cookies

Required Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Dialogue Earth - Dialogue Earth is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting a common understanding of the world's urgent environmental challenges. Read our privacy policy.

Cloudflare - Cloudflare is a service used for the purposes of increasing the security and performance of web sites and services. Read Cloudflare's privacy policy and terms of service.

Functional Cookies

Dialogue Earth uses several functional cookies to collect anonymous information such as the number of site visitors and the most popular pages. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website.

Google Analytics - The Google Analytics cookies are used to gather anonymous information about how you use our websites. We use this information to improve our sites and report on the reach of our content. Read Google's privacy policy and terms of service.

Advertising Cookies

This website uses the following additional cookies:

Google Inc. - Google operates Google Ads, Display & Video 360, and Google Ad Manager. These services allow advertisers to plan, execute and analyze marketing programs with greater ease and efficiency, while enabling publishers to maximize their returns from online advertising. Note that you may see cookies placed by Google for advertising, including the opt out cookie, under the Google.com or DoubleClick.net domains.

Twitter - Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find compelling and follow the conversations.

Facebook Inc. - Facebook is an online social networking service. China Dialogue aims to help guide our readers to content that they are interested in, so they can continue to read more of what they enjoy. If you are a social media user, then we are able to do this through a pixel provided by Facebook, which allows Facebook to place cookies on your web browser. For example, when a Facebook user returns to Facebook from our site, Facebook can identify them as part of a group of China Dialogue readers, and deliver them marketing messages from us, i.e. more of our content on biodiversity. Data that can be obtained through this is limited to the URL of the pages that have been visited and the limited information a browser might pass on, such as its IP address. In addition to the cookie controls that we mentioned above, if you are a Facebook user you can opt out by following this link.

Linkedin - LinkedIn is a business- and employment-oriented social networking service that operates via websites and mobile apps.