Justice

The UN’s ‘powerful affirmation’ of international law and climate justice

The Pacific island of Vanuatu notched up a major boost for climate action last Wednesday, successfully lobbying the UN to support a landmark international court of justice (ICJ) ruling made last year.

During last week’s UN general assembly in New York, Vanuatu introduced a draft resolution that “determined to translate the [ICJ]’s findings into enhanced multilateral cooperation and accelerated climate action at all levels, consistent with international law”. A total of 141 countries voted in favour of the resolution.

The UN secretary general, António Guterres, said the general assembly’s majority support was “a powerful affirmation of international law, climate justice, science and the responsibility of states to protect people from the escalating climate crisis.”

Eight countries formed the dissenting minority: Belarus, Iran, Israel, Liberia, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, the US and Yemen. The US ambassador Tammy Bruce labelled the resolution “highly problematic” and said it included “inappropriate political demands relating to fossil fuels and on other climate topics”.

Island states that see climate change as an existential threat have been at the forefront of a wave of climate court cases in recent years.

Vanuatu, alongside a core group of countries that have been driving these efforts, went to the ICJ in April 2023. The collective sought clarification on the obligations of states to protect the climate system. The court, based in The Hague in the Netherlands, is the principal judicial organ of the UN. (In 2025, we interviewed Vanuatu’s attorney general about the case.)

In 2022, another coalition of nations brought the climate issue to the international tribunal for the law of the sea (Itlos). Called the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Cosis), this coalition is led by Tuvalu, and Antigua and Barbuda. 

The opinions of these courts (bolstered by another, similarly affirmative ruling in July 2025 by the inter-American court of human rights) have been hailed by climate activists as strengthening the legal case for tough action to curb emissions.

Activists have hailed the outcome of last week’s UN vote as a welcome win during a year when multilateralism on reducing fossil fuel use has seemed increasingly threatened. 

“This must be a turning point in accountability for damaging the climate,” said Vishal Prasad. He directs Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, a campaign group that was instrumental in bringing the ICJ case.

“Communities on the frontlines, like in the Pacific, have been waiting far too long and continue to pay too high a price for the actions of others.”

Cookies Settings

Dialogue Earth uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser. It allows us to recognise you when you return to Dialogue Earth and helps us to understand which sections of the website you find useful.

Required Cookies

Required Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Dialogue Earth - Dialogue Earth is an independent organisation dedicated to promoting a common understanding of the world's urgent environmental challenges. Read our privacy policy.

Cloudflare - Cloudflare is a service used for the purposes of increasing the security and performance of web sites and services. Read Cloudflare's privacy policy and terms of service.

Functional Cookies

Dialogue Earth uses several functional cookies to collect anonymous information such as the number of site visitors and the most popular pages. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website.

Google Analytics - The Google Analytics cookies are used to gather anonymous information about how you use our websites. We use this information to improve our sites and report on the reach of our content. Read Google's privacy policy and terms of service.

Advertising Cookies

This website uses the following additional cookies:

Google Inc. - Google operates Google Ads, Display & Video 360, and Google Ad Manager. These services allow advertisers to plan, execute and analyze marketing programs with greater ease and efficiency, while enabling publishers to maximize their returns from online advertising. Note that you may see cookies placed by Google for advertising, including the opt out cookie, under the Google.com or DoubleClick.net domains.

Twitter - Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find compelling and follow the conversations.

Facebook Inc. - Facebook is an online social networking service. China Dialogue aims to help guide our readers to content that they are interested in, so they can continue to read more of what they enjoy. If you are a social media user, then we are able to do this through a pixel provided by Facebook, which allows Facebook to place cookies on your web browser. For example, when a Facebook user returns to Facebook from our site, Facebook can identify them as part of a group of China Dialogue readers, and deliver them marketing messages from us, i.e. more of our content on biodiversity. Data that can be obtained through this is limited to the URL of the pages that have been visited and the limited information a browser might pass on, such as its IP address. In addition to the cookie controls that we mentioned above, if you are a Facebook user you can opt out by following this link.

Linkedin - LinkedIn is a business- and employment-oriented social networking service that operates via websites and mobile apps.